<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 314 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776127</link>
    <description>Writ relief against cancellation of GST registration was declined in favour of the statutory appellate remedy under Section 107 of the CGST Act. The petitioner was left to pursue the appeal, and if filed by the stated date, the appellate authority was directed to consider it on merits and not reject it on limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2025 07:54:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=840865" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 314 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776127</link>
      <description>Writ relief against cancellation of GST registration was declined in favour of the statutory appellate remedy under Section 107 of the CGST Act. The petitioner was left to pursue the appeal, and if filed by the stated date, the appellate authority was directed to consider it on merits and not reject it on limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776127</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>