<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 1477 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463069</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the special leave petition, upholding the HC&#039;s decision that the Revenue acted illegally by compelling TCS collection on coal purchases genuinely used for power generation. The Court directed the Revenue to refund the entire TCS amount with interest to the intermediaries, who must then refund the Petitioner within a specified timeframe. The Petitioner&#039;s claim for refund and 18% interest was denied as the benefit under Section 206C(1A) did not warrant interference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2025 20:17:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=840820" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 1477 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463069</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the special leave petition, upholding the HC&#039;s decision that the Revenue acted illegally by compelling TCS collection on coal purchases genuinely used for power generation. The Court directed the Revenue to refund the entire TCS amount with interest to the intermediaries, who must then refund the Petitioner within a specified timeframe. The Petitioner&#039;s claim for refund and 18% interest was denied as the benefit under Section 206C(1A) did not warrant interference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463069</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>