https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45553 The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, exempting them from the pre-deposit requirement. The court found discrimination in granting exemptions to similarly placed entities and held that the extended limitation period for duty demands did not apply in this case. Emphasizing the petitioners' financial hardship and the prima facie case presented, the court directed the Tribunal to hear and dispose of the appeal promptly, setting aside the default dismissal clause for failure to deposit. The writ petitions were disposed of with no costs awarded. en-us Wed, 28 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:52:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45553 The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, exempting them from the pre-deposit requirement. The court found discrimination in granting exemptions to similarly placed entities and held that the extended limitation period for duty demands did not apply in this case. Emphasizing the petitioners' financial hardship and the prima facie case presented, the court directed the Tribunal to hear and dispose of the appeal promptly, setting aside the default dismissal clause for failure to deposit. The writ petitions were disposed of with no costs awarded. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 28 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45553