<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (6) TMI 33 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45552</link>
    <description>Under Section 146(2) of the Customs Act and the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 1984, renewal of a customs house agent licence depends on compliance with regulatory duties, including the obligations in Regulation 14. Where the licence holder stood surety for differential duty and failed to discharge that guaranteed liability, the conduct was treated as a breach falling within Regulation 14(g) read with Regulation 12(2)(b). The fact that the agent did not physically receive the importers&#039; money did not excuse non-compliance. On that basis, refusal to renew the licence was regarded as a justified regulatory response to breach of duty and loss of confidence in the licence holder.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:51:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84079" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (6) TMI 33 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45552</link>
      <description>Under Section 146(2) of the Customs Act and the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 1984, renewal of a customs house agent licence depends on compliance with regulatory duties, including the obligations in Regulation 14. Where the licence holder stood surety for differential duty and failed to discharge that guaranteed liability, the conduct was treated as a breach falling within Regulation 14(g) read with Regulation 12(2)(b). The fact that the agent did not physically receive the importers&#039; money did not excuse non-compliance. On that basis, refusal to renew the licence was regarded as a justified regulatory response to breach of duty and loss of confidence in the licence holder.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45552</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>