<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Supply made to SEZ but LUT not file</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=120322</link>
    <description>Belated filing of a Letter of Undertaking is described as a procedural matter that should not by itself deny zero-rated or export-related benefits. The discussion addresses supplies to an SEZ unit for authorised operations and exports of services made before LUT application, including pending GST return filings. It refers to a GST circular and related refund clarifications in support of treating such supplies as zero-rated under a subsequently filed LUT.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2025 17:42:35 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 13:53:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=840782" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Supply made to SEZ but LUT not file</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=120322</link>
      <description>Belated filing of a Letter of Undertaking is described as a procedural matter that should not by itself deny zero-rated or export-related benefits. The discussion addresses supplies to an SEZ unit for authorised operations and exports of services made before LUT application, including pending GST return filings. It refers to a GST circular and related refund clarifications in support of treating such supplies as zero-rated under a subsequently filed LUT.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2025 17:42:35 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=120322</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>