<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (9) TMI 74 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45551</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of the condition requiring tea factories to have operated for at least six months during 1998-99 to qualify for excise duty exemption. It found the condition to be based on valid reasons and not arbitrary, aimed at assisting long-established tea manufacturing factories. The court emphasized the deference owed to legislative judgment in economic matters and dismissed the writ petitions challenging the condition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:45:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84078" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (9) TMI 74 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45551</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of the condition requiring tea factories to have operated for at least six months during 1998-99 to qualify for excise duty exemption. It found the condition to be based on valid reasons and not arbitrary, aimed at assisting long-established tea manufacturing factories. The court emphasized the deference owed to legislative judgment in economic matters and dismissed the writ petitions challenging the condition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45551</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>