https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45550 The court quashed the impugned order and remanded the matter to the first respondent for fresh consideration of the refund claim in accordance with the law. The first respondent was directed to give the petitioner a reasonable opportunity to prove that the incidence of duty had not been passed on to the consumers. If satisfied, the first respondent was instructed to refund the pre-deposit without further delay. The petitioner's claim for interest under Section 11BB was left open for future determination. en-us Thu, 22 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45550 The court quashed the impugned order and remanded the matter to the first respondent for fresh consideration of the refund claim in accordance with the law. The first respondent was directed to give the petitioner a reasonable opportunity to prove that the incidence of duty had not been passed on to the consumers. If satisfied, the first respondent was instructed to refund the pre-deposit without further delay. The petitioner's claim for interest under Section 11BB was left open for future determination. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 22 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45550