https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45544 A writ petition challenging a show cause notice was held premature because the petitioner had already replied and failed to show that the issuing authority lacked inherent jurisdiction. The dispute concerned Modvat credit and resultant excise liability, matters within the statutory authority's competence under the excise framework. The court found the cited precedents inapplicable since the notice was not shown to be wholly without authority. As no prejudice was demonstrated by requiring participation in the statutory adjudication process, the petitioner was left to contest any adverse order after adjudication. The challenge to the notice was therefore rejected. en-us Thu, 03 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:29:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45544 A writ petition challenging a show cause notice was held premature because the petitioner had already replied and failed to show that the issuing authority lacked inherent jurisdiction. The dispute concerned Modvat credit and resultant excise liability, matters within the statutory authority's competence under the excise framework. The court found the cited precedents inapplicable since the notice was not shown to be wholly without authority. As no prejudice was demonstrated by requiring participation in the statutory adjudication process, the petitioner was left to contest any adverse order after adjudication. The challenge to the notice was therefore rejected. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 03 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45544