https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775988 The HC set aside the impugned order dated 17.04.2025 due to an undue delay of 13 months in its pronouncement, which resulted in failure to consider relevant submissions and documents. Citing the SC's directive on timely and well-reasoned judgments, the HC found that key issues were overlooked. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner of CGST and CX, Panaji, Goa, with instructions that if the adjudicating authority has changed, fresh proceedings must be initiated. Petition allowed by way of remand. en-us Wed, 23 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Aug 2025 08:28:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775988 The HC set aside the impugned order dated 17.04.2025 due to an undue delay of 13 months in its pronouncement, which resulted in failure to consider relevant submissions and documents. Citing the SC's directive on timely and well-reasoned judgments, the HC found that key issues were overlooked. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner of CGST and CX, Panaji, Goa, with instructions that if the adjudicating authority has changed, fresh proceedings must be initiated. Petition allowed by way of remand. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 23 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775988