<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 200 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776013</link>
    <description>The ITAT Ahmedabad allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that adjustments under section 143(1) cannot be made without prior intimation to the assessee as mandated by the first proviso to section 143(1)(a). The CPC made adjustments without issuing any notice or intimation, directly reducing the refund claimed. This procedural lapse rendered the adjustments invalid, resulting in the appeal being allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2025 08:28:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=840621" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 200 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776013</link>
      <description>The ITAT Ahmedabad allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that adjustments under section 143(1) cannot be made without prior intimation to the assessee as mandated by the first proviso to section 143(1)(a). The CPC made adjustments without issuing any notice or intimation, directly reducing the refund claimed. This procedural lapse rendered the adjustments invalid, resulting in the appeal being allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776013</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>