https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776016 ITAT Pune held that the Assessing Officer's allowance of deduction under section 80G for Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) expenditure was justified, referencing precedents supporting such deductions. The tribunal found the issue debatable and concluded that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) was not justified in invoking revision jurisdiction under section 263 to partly set aside the AO's order. Consequently, the PCIT's order was set aside, and the assessee's claim for deduction under section 80G was upheld. en-us Wed, 30 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Aug 2025 08:28:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776016 ITAT Pune held that the Assessing Officer's allowance of deduction under section 80G for Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) expenditure was justified, referencing precedents supporting such deductions. The tribunal found the issue debatable and concluded that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) was not justified in invoking revision jurisdiction under section 263 to partly set aside the AO's order. Consequently, the PCIT's order was set aside, and the assessee's claim for deduction under section 80G was upheld. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 30 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776016