<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (12) TMI 79 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45534</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Customs Department&#039;s assessment using the Customs Exchange Rate, finding it in accordance with statutory provisions. The petitioner&#039;s claims of arbitrariness, capriciousness, and violation of fundamental rights under Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) were dismissed, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition for lack of merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 12:49:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84061" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (12) TMI 79 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45534</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Customs Department&#039;s assessment using the Customs Exchange Rate, finding it in accordance with statutory provisions. The petitioner&#039;s claims of arbitrariness, capriciousness, and violation of fundamental rights under Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) were dismissed, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition for lack of merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45534</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>