<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 220 - ADDITIONAL SESSIONS COURT, MEERUT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776033</link>
    <description>The Additional Sessions Court, Meerut, dismissed the bail application of the accused arrested under section 69 of the CGST Act, 2017, for clandestine supply of goods without issuing invoices and fraudulent availing of ITC amounting to over Rs. 9.32 crore, along with GST evasion of Rs. 0.58 crore. The accused, a key partner in the firm, confessed to the offences and was found to have received cash payments and paid commissions to fake invoice issuers. The court noted the absence of a charge sheet and held that releasing the accused on bail posed a risk of evidence tampering, witness influence, and flight. Considering the gravity of the economic offences and relevant SC precedents, bail was refused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2025 08:28:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=840601" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 220 - ADDITIONAL SESSIONS COURT, MEERUT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776033</link>
      <description>The Additional Sessions Court, Meerut, dismissed the bail application of the accused arrested under section 69 of the CGST Act, 2017, for clandestine supply of goods without issuing invoices and fraudulent availing of ITC amounting to over Rs. 9.32 crore, along with GST evasion of Rs. 0.58 crore. The accused, a key partner in the firm, confessed to the offences and was found to have received cash payments and paid commissions to fake invoice issuers. The court noted the absence of a charge sheet and held that releasing the accused on bail posed a risk of evidence tampering, witness influence, and flight. Considering the gravity of the economic offences and relevant SC precedents, bail was refused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776033</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>