<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (1) TMI 59 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45533</link>
    <description>Where show cause notices in a taxation matter rely on specific annexed documents, the department must furnish authenticated copies of those materials before adjudication. Mere inspection is not an adequate substitute unless supplying copies is impracticable or the setting is materially different, such as where the records are voluminous. The operative principle is that a person facing adverse action must receive the material relied upon against him to enable an effective reply. The petitioner was therefore entitled to authenticated copies, and further proceedings could continue only after disclosure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 12:47:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84060" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (1) TMI 59 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45533</link>
      <description>Where show cause notices in a taxation matter rely on specific annexed documents, the department must furnish authenticated copies of those materials before adjudication. Mere inspection is not an adequate substitute unless supplying copies is impracticable or the setting is materially different, such as where the records are voluminous. The operative principle is that a person facing adverse action must receive the material relied upon against him to enable an effective reply. The petitioner was therefore entitled to authenticated copies, and further proceedings could continue only after disclosure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45533</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>