https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776038 The HC held that the petitioner was afforded multiple opportunities for personal hearing and failed to appear or respond to notices sent via email. The claim of non-receipt of the hearing notice dated February 15, 2024, was rejected. The petition was dismissed as the petitioner had an alternative efficacious remedy under the multi-tier adjudicatory process. However, the court allowed the petitioner to file an appeal against the impugned order within four weeks, directing the Appellate Authority to hear and dispose of it on merits, subject to compliance with formalities and an application for condonation of delay. The petition was disposed of accordingly. en-us Mon, 19 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Aug 2025 08:28:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776038 The HC held that the petitioner was afforded multiple opportunities for personal hearing and failed to appear or respond to notices sent via email. The claim of non-receipt of the hearing notice dated February 15, 2024, was rejected. The petition was dismissed as the petitioner had an alternative efficacious remedy under the multi-tier adjudicatory process. However, the court allowed the petitioner to file an appeal against the impugned order within four weeks, directing the Appellate Authority to hear and dispose of it on merits, subject to compliance with formalities and an application for condonation of delay. The petition was disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws GST Mon, 19 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776038