<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 227 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776040</link>
    <description>A one-day delay in filing an appeal was condoned because the last day for filing fell on a Sunday and public holiday, and the explanation was found genuine. The rejection of the appeal solely on limitation was held unwarranted in the circumstances, and the appeal was restored to the record for adjudication on merits after opportunity to be heard.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2025 08:28:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=840594" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 227 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776040</link>
      <description>A one-day delay in filing an appeal was condoned because the last day for filing fell on a Sunday and public holiday, and the explanation was found genuine. The rejection of the appeal solely on limitation was held unwarranted in the circumstances, and the appeal was restored to the record for adjudication on merits after opportunity to be heard.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776040</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>