<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 230 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776043</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the petition under Article 226, finding the facts and issues identical to those in a prior case (WPC No.2870/2025). The court declined to deviate from its earlier decision and upheld the previous order dated 16.06.2025, thereby rejecting the present petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2025 08:28:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=840591" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 230 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776043</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the petition under Article 226, finding the facts and issues identical to those in a prior case (WPC No.2870/2025). The court declined to deviate from its earlier decision and upheld the previous order dated 16.06.2025, thereby rejecting the present petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776043</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>