<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 231 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776044</link>
    <description>A writ petition challenging a GST tax demand order was not pursued on merits because an appellate remedy was available under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The petitioner was directed to file an appeal before the Appellate Authority under Section 107 within the stipulated time, and the appeal was to be protected against dismissal on limitation if filed by the specified date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2025 08:28:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=840590" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 231 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776044</link>
      <description>A writ petition challenging a GST tax demand order was not pursued on merits because an appellate remedy was available under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The petitioner was directed to file an appeal before the Appellate Authority under Section 107 within the stipulated time, and the appeal was to be protected against dismissal on limitation if filed by the specified date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776044</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>