https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776052 The HC held that bail must be considered individually for each accused based on their specific role and circumstances. Denial of bail solely due to pending investigation against a co-accused under Section 132 of the CGST Act is not justified. The petitioners, having clean antecedents and cooperating fully, were granted regular bail. The Court noted that most evidence was documentary/electronic and already with the investigating agency. Bail was allowed subject to furnishing bonds and compliance with conditions imposed. en-us Mon, 28 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Aug 2025 08:28:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776052 The HC held that bail must be considered individually for each accused based on their specific role and circumstances. Denial of bail solely due to pending investigation against a co-accused under Section 132 of the CGST Act is not justified. The petitioners, having clean antecedents and cooperating fully, were granted regular bail. The Court noted that most evidence was documentary/electronic and already with the investigating agency. Bail was allowed subject to furnishing bonds and compliance with conditions imposed. Case-Laws GST Mon, 28 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776052