<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (10) TMI 78 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45525</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the petition challenging a review order issued under Section 129D(2) of the Customs Act. The court found the review order valid and directed the assessee to comply with statutory requirements for duty drawback claims. The petition was dismissed, the interim order was vacated, and the pending appeal was directed to be expedited within six months. An oral application for continuation of the stay order was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 12:31:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84052" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (10) TMI 78 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45525</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the petition challenging a review order issued under Section 129D(2) of the Customs Act. The court found the review order valid and directed the assessee to comply with statutory requirements for duty drawback claims. The petition was dismissed, the interim order was vacated, and the pending appeal was directed to be expedited within six months. An oral application for continuation of the stay order was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45525</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>