<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (6) TMI 31 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45524</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Consumer Forum&#039;s jurisdiction to decide the customs duty refund claim, emphasizing the petitioner&#039;s participation in the forum&#039;s proceedings and failure to exhaust available appellate remedies. The court also addressed the validity of the refund claim made after the limitation period, highlighting the statutory provisions governing refund claims under the Customs Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 12:29:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84051" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (6) TMI 31 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45524</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Consumer Forum&#039;s jurisdiction to decide the customs duty refund claim, emphasizing the petitioner&#039;s participation in the forum&#039;s proceedings and failure to exhaust available appellate remedies. The court also addressed the validity of the refund claim made after the limitation period, highlighting the statutory provisions governing refund claims under the Customs Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45524</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>