<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (4) TMI 45 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45523</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging an order by the Customs Excise &amp;amp; Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, Eastern Bench, Calcutta, which imposed duty, fine, and penalty on the petitioners. The petitioners sought to excuse pre-deposit for appealing against the order, arguing that their case fell under different tariff chapters. The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing that no new case was presented during the review process and that the issue of limitation had been considered. The petitioners were allowed to approach the appropriate authority or Tribunal in the future, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 12:27:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84050" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (4) TMI 45 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45523</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging an order by the Customs Excise &amp;amp; Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, Eastern Bench, Calcutta, which imposed duty, fine, and penalty on the petitioners. The petitioners sought to excuse pre-deposit for appealing against the order, arguing that their case fell under different tariff chapters. The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing that no new case was presented during the review process and that the issue of limitation had been considered. The petitioners were allowed to approach the appropriate authority or Tribunal in the future, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45523</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>