<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 1611 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463052</link>
    <description>ITAT Pune held that addition under section 68 for unexplained cash deposits during demonetization was not justified as the AO failed to prove that the assessee collected demonetized currency after 08.11.2016. The assessee provided a list of members with PANs, and there was no dispute regarding their identity. The appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2025 16:00:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=840498" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 1611 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463052</link>
      <description>ITAT Pune held that addition under section 68 for unexplained cash deposits during demonetization was not justified as the AO failed to prove that the assessee collected demonetized currency after 08.11.2016. The assessee provided a list of members with PANs, and there was no dispute regarding their identity. The appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463052</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>