<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Warranty Provision Allowed as Deduction Under Section 37 for Reasonable Business Expense</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91173</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, holding that the warranty provision constitutes an allowable deduction under section 37 of the Act. The tribunal found that the provision was systematically and consistently calculated based on a scientific methodology aligned with the company&#039;s business operations and turnover, rather than being arbitrary or a tax avoidance device. It rejected the lower authorities&#039; characterization of the provision as contingent and disallowable, emphasizing that the liability was ascertained, expected to be utilized within a year, and complied with accrual accounting principles and relevant Accounting Standards under the Companies Act, 2013. The tribunal relied on established precedent affirming that such warranty .....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2025 07:24:51 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2025 07:24:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=840438" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Warranty Provision Allowed as Deduction Under Section 37 for Reasonable Business Expense</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91173</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, holding that the warranty provision constitutes an allowable deduction under section 37 of the Act. The tribunal found that the provision was systematically and consistently calculated based on a scientific methodology aligned with the company&#039;s business operations and turnover, rather than being arbitrary or a tax avoidance device. It rejected the lower authorities&#039; characterization of the provision as contingent and disallowable, emphasizing that the liability was ascertained, expected to be utilized within a year, and complied with accrual accounting principles and relevant Accounting Standards under the Companies Act, 2013. The tribunal relied on established precedent affirming that such warranty .....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2025 07:24:51 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91173</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>