<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (9) TMI 99 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45516</link>
    <description>A licence obtained by fraud or misrepresentation is voidable, not void from inception, so a later cancellation does not by itself make a completed import unauthorised or justify confiscation under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962. The discussion also notes that a finding of misdeclaration of value under Section 111(m) must rest on recorded valuation evidence and may require reconsideration if not fully addressed. A separate confiscation basis under Section 111(p) for alleged non-compliance with notified goods and storage requirements must be examined independently. The matter therefore required fresh adjudication on the surviving valuation and storage issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2025 21:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84043" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (9) TMI 99 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45516</link>
      <description>A licence obtained by fraud or misrepresentation is voidable, not void from inception, so a later cancellation does not by itself make a completed import unauthorised or justify confiscation under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962. The discussion also notes that a finding of misdeclaration of value under Section 111(m) must rest on recorded valuation evidence and may require reconsideration if not fully addressed. A separate confiscation basis under Section 111(p) for alleged non-compliance with notified goods and storage requirements must be examined independently. The matter therefore required fresh adjudication on the surviving valuation and storage issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45516</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>