https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45515 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner in a claim for Mandamus to pay a sum with interest. The court found that the petitioner had validly imported the machines and that the first respondent was not justified in seizing the goods. Citing legal precedents, the court held that Customs Authorities should bear the burden when valuable goods are unlawfully seized, leading to loss for the owner. The court ordered the first respondent to pay the amount paid towards demurrage charges and granted interest at 12% per annum, granting the relief sought by the petitioner. en-us Tue, 25 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Jul 2010 12:01:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45515 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner in a claim for Mandamus to pay a sum with interest. The court found that the petitioner had validly imported the machines and that the first respondent was not justified in seizing the goods. Citing legal precedents, the court held that Customs Authorities should bear the burden when valuable goods are unlawfully seized, leading to loss for the owner. The court ordered the first respondent to pay the amount paid towards demurrage charges and granted interest at 12% per annum, granting the relief sought by the petitioner. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 25 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45515