<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 84 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775897</link>
    <description>Inadmissible CENVAT credit voluntarily reversed before the show-cause notice, after audit objection, did not establish suppression of facts or mala fide intent, so penalty based on the extended period was not sustainable and was set aside. Interest on the credit for the period of utilisation remained payable as a compensatory consequence until reversal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2025 07:24:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=840416" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 84 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775897</link>
      <description>Inadmissible CENVAT credit voluntarily reversed before the show-cause notice, after audit objection, did not establish suppression of facts or mala fide intent, so penalty based on the extended period was not sustainable and was set aside. Interest on the credit for the period of utilisation remained payable as a compensatory consequence until reversal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775897</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>