<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 117 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775930</link>
    <description>The ITAT Kolkata upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition made under section 69A concerning large cash deposits during the demonetization period. The AO&#039;s addition was unsustainable as the amounts formed part of the disclosed business turnover and were reflected in the income return. Since the AO did not dispute the turnover, the addition lacked merit. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2025 07:24:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=840383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 117 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775930</link>
      <description>The ITAT Kolkata upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition made under section 69A concerning large cash deposits during the demonetization period. The AO&#039;s addition was unsustainable as the amounts formed part of the disclosed business turnover and were reflected in the income return. Since the AO did not dispute the turnover, the addition lacked merit. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775930</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>