https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775934 The ITAT Chennai upheld the validity of the rectification order under section 154, rejecting the Revenue's contention that the CIT(A)/NFAC order was erroneous. The CIT(A) had deleted seven additions made by the AO, relying on precedent from the Tribunal and Supreme Court decisions. The Tribunal found the CIT(A)'s use of the phrase "reconsider the issues" to be an inadvertent choice of words that did not vitiate the order. Consequently, the appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed. en-us Wed, 04 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Aug 2025 07:24:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775934 The ITAT Chennai upheld the validity of the rectification order under section 154, rejecting the Revenue's contention that the CIT(A)/NFAC order was erroneous. The CIT(A) had deleted seven additions made by the AO, relying on precedent from the Tribunal and Supreme Court decisions. The Tribunal found the CIT(A)'s use of the phrase "reconsider the issues" to be an inadvertent choice of words that did not vitiate the order. Consequently, the appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 04 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775934