<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 129 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775942</link>
    <description>The ITAT Bangalore condoned a 10-day delay in filing an appeal, emphasizing that rejecting such delay would perpetuate injustice on technical grounds. Citing Supreme Court and ITAT precedents, the tribunal held that substantial justice must prevail over procedural lapses, especially when the delay is short and non-deliberate. The tribunal ruled that refusal to condone delay would validate an illegal order and unjustly enrich the State. Consequently, the delay was condoned, and the appeal was admitted for adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2025 07:24:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=840371" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 129 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775942</link>
      <description>The ITAT Bangalore condoned a 10-day delay in filing an appeal, emphasizing that rejecting such delay would perpetuate injustice on technical grounds. Citing Supreme Court and ITAT precedents, the tribunal held that substantial justice must prevail over procedural lapses, especially when the delay is short and non-deliberate. The tribunal ruled that refusal to condone delay would validate an illegal order and unjustly enrich the State. Consequently, the delay was condoned, and the appeal was admitted for adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775942</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>