https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45510 The High Court declined to interfere with the impugned stay order while the statutory appeal remained pending, leaving the merits to the appellate forum. It held that the controversy should be decided in the pending appeal rather than under Article 226, and directed the appellate authority to hear and dispose of the appeal expeditiously without insisting on pre-deposit. The court therefore refrained from expressing any view on the validity of the impugned reasoning and confined its intervention to ensuring an effective appellate hearing. en-us Fri, 02 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Jul 2010 11:48:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45510 The High Court declined to interfere with the impugned stay order while the statutory appeal remained pending, leaving the merits to the appellate forum. It held that the controversy should be decided in the pending appeal rather than under Article 226, and directed the appellate authority to hear and dispose of the appeal expeditiously without insisting on pre-deposit. The court therefore refrained from expressing any view on the validity of the impugned reasoning and confined its intervention to ensuring an effective appellate hearing. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 02 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45510