<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 139 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775952</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi held that a notice issued under Section 148 on 31-3-2021 but served on 1-4-2021 mandates reassessment under the amended provisions of Section 148A. The AO framed reassessment under the old provisions, which was contrary to the Supreme Court ruling in Ashish Agarwal and Delhi HC decision in Rajeev Chopra. Consequently, the reassessment order dated 28-3-2022 was quashed as void ab initio. The assessee&#039;s appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2025 07:24:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=840361" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 139 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775952</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi held that a notice issued under Section 148 on 31-3-2021 but served on 1-4-2021 mandates reassessment under the amended provisions of Section 148A. The AO framed reassessment under the old provisions, which was contrary to the Supreme Court ruling in Ashish Agarwal and Delhi HC decision in Rajeev Chopra. Consequently, the reassessment order dated 28-3-2022 was quashed as void ab initio. The assessee&#039;s appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775952</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>