<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 145 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775958</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal against TP adjustments involving notional interest on loans to AEs and outstanding receivables. The tribunal held that since no interest was charged on receivables from non-AEs, no notional interest could be attributed to AEs. Both the TPO and CIT(A) were found unjustified in sustaining such additions. Additionally, the ITAT directed the AO to apply a 1% commission rate on corporate guarantees, following precedent. The appeal was allowed for all three years under consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2025 07:24:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=840355" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 145 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775958</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal against TP adjustments involving notional interest on loans to AEs and outstanding receivables. The tribunal held that since no interest was charged on receivables from non-AEs, no notional interest could be attributed to AEs. Both the TPO and CIT(A) were found unjustified in sustaining such additions. Additionally, the ITAT directed the AO to apply a 1% commission rate on corporate guarantees, following precedent. The appeal was allowed for all three years under consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775958</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>