<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 157 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775970</link>
    <description>The HC held that a Summary of the Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 does not replace a proper SCN required under Section 73(1). The impugned orders passed without a duly authenticated SCN violated statutory requirements and principles of natural justice, as no proper hearing opportunity was provided per Section 75(4). The Court emphasized that the Proper Officer must issue a formal SCN, Statement, and final Order under Section 73, all properly authenticated, preferably digitally signed under Rule 26(3). The orders dated 29.04.2024 were set aside for non-compliance with these mandates. However, liberty was granted to the respondents to initiate fresh proceedings under Section 73 in accordance with the law. Petition allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2025 16:56:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=840343" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 157 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775970</link>
      <description>The HC held that a Summary of the Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 does not replace a proper SCN required under Section 73(1). The impugned orders passed without a duly authenticated SCN violated statutory requirements and principles of natural justice, as no proper hearing opportunity was provided per Section 75(4). The Court emphasized that the Proper Officer must issue a formal SCN, Statement, and final Order under Section 73, all properly authenticated, preferably digitally signed under Rule 26(3). The orders dated 29.04.2024 were set aside for non-compliance with these mandates. However, liberty was granted to the respondents to initiate fresh proceedings under Section 73 in accordance with the law. Petition allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775970</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>