https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=51321 The challenge alleges that DHS exceeded its statutory authority by expanding expedited removal to individuals admitted under humanitarian parole, thereby exposing parolees who entered through ports of entry to summary removal procedures that limit their ability to seek asylum or other immigration relief. The litigation examines whether such enforcement practices and courtroom arrests align with statutory constraints on executive removal power and the procedural protections owed to parole entrants. en-us Sat, 02 Aug 2025 02:46:02 +0530 Sat, 02 Aug 2025 02:46:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=51321 The challenge alleges that DHS exceeded its statutory authority by expanding expedited removal to individuals admitted under humanitarian parole, thereby exposing parolees who entered through ports of entry to summary removal procedures that limit their ability to seek asylum or other immigration relief. The litigation examines whether such enforcement practices and courtroom arrests align with statutory constraints on executive removal power and the procedural protections owed to parole entrants. News - Sat, 02 Aug 2025 02:46:02 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=51321