https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463026 A plaint for specific performance was liable to rejection under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC because it did not disclose an enforceable cause of action against defendants No. 1 and 2. The agreement to sell was pleaded to have been executed by defendant No. 3 as power of attorney holder of the original owner, but the pleadings showed the donor had died in 1997. On that footing, the suit property had already devolved on defendants No. 1 and 2, and defendant No. 3 lacked subsisting authority to bind them or execute the agreement. The rejection of the plaint was upheld and the appeal failed. en-us Thu, 21 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Aug 2025 22:57:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463026 A plaint for specific performance was liable to rejection under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC because it did not disclose an enforceable cause of action against defendants No. 1 and 2. The agreement to sell was pleaded to have been executed by defendant No. 3 as power of attorney holder of the original owner, but the pleadings showed the donor had died in 1997. On that footing, the suit property had already devolved on defendants No. 1 and 2, and defendant No. 3 lacked subsisting authority to bind them or execute the agreement. The rejection of the plaint was upheld and the appeal failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 21 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463026