https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463030 Superior courts may correct legal errors in a judicial order and use firm language directed to those errors, but personal or stigmatic remarks against a serving judicial officer are improper when unnecessary to decide the controversy. Criticism must stay confined to the legality of the impugned order, because adverse comments on the officer's conduct or future approach can stigmatise the officer and cause lasting harm without affording a hearing. Where misconduct or impropriety is noticed, judicial review of the order should be kept separate from any administrative consideration of the officer's conduct. On that principle, unnecessary remarks describing the officer's approach and future conduct were held liable to be expunged. en-us Fri, 22 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Aug 2025 22:57:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463030 Superior courts may correct legal errors in a judicial order and use firm language directed to those errors, but personal or stigmatic remarks against a serving judicial officer are improper when unnecessary to decide the controversy. Criticism must stay confined to the legality of the impugned order, because adverse comments on the officer's conduct or future approach can stigmatise the officer and cause lasting harm without affording a hearing. Where misconduct or impropriety is noticed, judicial review of the order should be kept separate from any administrative consideration of the officer's conduct. On that principle, unnecessary remarks describing the officer's approach and future conduct were held liable to be expunged. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 22 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463030