<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 1489 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463035</link>
    <description>The ITAT Kolkata held that penalty under section 271(1)(b) for non-compliance with AO&#039;s notice was not justified where the assessment was completed under section 143(3) and the assessee made subsequent substantial compliance. Following precedents, the Tribunal found no wilful default by the assessee and cancelled the penalty imposed by the AO and confirmed by the CIT(A). The appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2025 22:57:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=840325" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 1489 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463035</link>
      <description>The ITAT Kolkata held that penalty under section 271(1)(b) for non-compliance with AO&#039;s notice was not justified where the assessment was completed under section 143(3) and the assessee made subsequent substantial compliance. Following precedents, the Tribunal found no wilful default by the assessee and cancelled the penalty imposed by the AO and confirmed by the CIT(A). The appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463035</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>