https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463042 The HC dismissed the writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, holding that it should not entertain cases involving disputed questions of fact. The Court relied on SC precedent establishing that when factual disputes arise, the High Court's writ jurisdiction is inappropriate. Since the relief sought depended on resolving factual controversies, the petition was deemed unsuitable for adjudication under Article 226. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for lack of proper jurisdiction. en-us Mon, 16 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Aug 2025 22:57:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463042 The HC dismissed the writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, holding that it should not entertain cases involving disputed questions of fact. The Court relied on SC precedent establishing that when factual disputes arise, the High Court's writ jurisdiction is inappropriate. Since the relief sought depended on resolving factual controversies, the petition was deemed unsuitable for adjudication under Article 226. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for lack of proper jurisdiction. Case-Laws GST Mon, 16 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463042