https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45497 Availability of an alternate statutory remedy does not, by itself, bar writ jurisdiction where the challenge alleges breach of statutory procedure or natural justice, and the writ remained maintainable despite the pending appeal route. The tribunal also cannot rely on a new factual basis or additional material without first giving the affected party a fair opportunity to respond, especially where Rule 23 limits admission of fresh evidence. On that basis, the adverse order was held vitiated for procedural unfairness, quashed, and the matter remitted for fresh consideration in accordance with the prescribed procedure. en-us Mon, 21 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Jul 2010 11:09:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45497 Availability of an alternate statutory remedy does not, by itself, bar writ jurisdiction where the challenge alleges breach of statutory procedure or natural justice, and the writ remained maintainable despite the pending appeal route. The tribunal also cannot rely on a new factual basis or additional material without first giving the affected party a fair opportunity to respond, especially where Rule 23 limits admission of fresh evidence. On that basis, the adverse order was held vitiated for procedural unfairness, quashed, and the matter remitted for fresh consideration in accordance with the prescribed procedure. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 21 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45497