<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (2) TMI 107 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45494</link>
    <description>Where excisable goods are sold directly to buyers and no wholesale market exists, the direct-sale price cannot be treated as a wholesale price for valuation purposes. On the factual findings accepted by the Collector (Appeals) and CEGAT, sales to dealers were limited and did not establish a wholesale market, so valuation had to proceed under Rule 6(a) of the Central Excise (Valuation) Rules, 1975. The CEGAT&#039;s valuation was therefore upheld and required no interference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 10:53:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84021" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (2) TMI 107 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45494</link>
      <description>Where excisable goods are sold directly to buyers and no wholesale market exists, the direct-sale price cannot be treated as a wholesale price for valuation purposes. On the factual findings accepted by the Collector (Appeals) and CEGAT, sales to dealers were limited and did not establish a wholesale market, so valuation had to proceed under Rule 6(a) of the Central Excise (Valuation) Rules, 1975. The CEGAT&#039;s valuation was therefore upheld and required no interference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45494</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>