https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45490 Classification of a tobacco product as cut piece tobacco or unmanufactured tobacco, including whether it fell under Entry No. 2401.00 with nil duty, was treated as a technical excise question best examined by the departmental authorities under the Act. Because an adjudicatory process was already available through the show cause proceedings, the High Court declined to entertain the writ petitions and left the petitioner to raise all contentions before the competent departmental forum. en-us Tue, 09 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Jul 2010 10:43:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45490 Classification of a tobacco product as cut piece tobacco or unmanufactured tobacco, including whether it fell under Entry No. 2401.00 with nil duty, was treated as a technical excise question best examined by the departmental authorities under the Act. Because an adjudicatory process was already available through the show cause proceedings, the High Court declined to entertain the writ petitions and left the petitioner to raise all contentions before the competent departmental forum. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 09 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45490