<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 78 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775891</link>
    <description>The HC held that filing an appeal along with the pre-deposit under Section 107(7) of the CGST Act, 2017 automatically stays the impugned order. Consequently, the provisional attachment of the bank account was found unsustainable. The petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2025 08:28:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=840165" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 78 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775891</link>
      <description>The HC held that filing an appeal along with the pre-deposit under Section 107(7) of the CGST Act, 2017 automatically stays the impugned order. Consequently, the provisional attachment of the bank account was found unsustainable. The petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775891</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>