https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45488 The court refrained from making a decision on the merits of the case concerning the violation of conditions for importing capital goods without duty payment under an EOU scheme. Instead, it directed the department to conclude its investigation and issue a final order by a specified date. The restraint order would remain in effect until then, with provisions for expedited action due to the perishable nature of the goods. The judgment aimed to ensure procedural fairness and timely resolution while upholding the legal framework governing EOU permissions and export activities. en-us Tue, 21 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Jul 2010 10:39:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45488 The court refrained from making a decision on the merits of the case concerning the violation of conditions for importing capital goods without duty payment under an EOU scheme. Instead, it directed the department to conclude its investigation and issue a final order by a specified date. The restraint order would remain in effect until then, with provisions for expedited action due to the perishable nature of the goods. The judgment aimed to ensure procedural fairness and timely resolution while upholding the legal framework governing EOU permissions and export activities. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 21 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45488