<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>ITAT Upholds Income Estimation Under Section 145(3) Due to Lack of Documentary Evidence and Non-Compliance</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91122</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the rejection of the appellant&#039;s audited books under section 145(3) due to failure to furnish any documentary evidence substantiating the correctness of the return or details of inventory clearance following the firm&#039;s dissolution. The AO&#039;s estimation of income based on 25% of inventory value, reduced from 50%, was affirmed as a reasonable approximation in light of absent records such as stock movement, sales invoices, and bank statements. The appellant&#039;s failure to prosecute the appeal before the NFAC and non-compliance with procedural notices further weakened its position. The Tribunal found no merit in the appellant&#039;s claims regarding forced stock clearance and ongoing disputes, concluding that the ad-hoc estimations by t.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2025 08:15:04 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2025 08:15:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=840129" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>ITAT Upholds Income Estimation Under Section 145(3) Due to Lack of Documentary Evidence and Non-Compliance</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91122</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the rejection of the appellant&#039;s audited books under section 145(3) due to failure to furnish any documentary evidence substantiating the correctness of the return or details of inventory clearance following the firm&#039;s dissolution. The AO&#039;s estimation of income based on 25% of inventory value, reduced from 50%, was affirmed as a reasonable approximation in light of absent records such as stock movement, sales invoices, and bank statements. The appellant&#039;s failure to prosecute the appeal before the NFAC and non-compliance with procedural notices further weakened its position. The Tribunal found no merit in the appellant&#039;s claims regarding forced stock clearance and ongoing disputes, concluding that the ad-hoc estimations by t.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2025 08:15:04 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91122</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>