<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Remuneration to Whole-Time Directors Treated as Salary, Not Service Taxable Under Section 65(105)(zzzz)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91111</link>
    <description>The CESTAT allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand and penalties for service tax levied on remuneration paid to whole-time directors. It was held that the directors, appointed under employment agreements and recognized as key managerial personnel under the Companies Act, function as employees rather than service providers. Their remuneration, subjected to TDS under the Income Tax Act, establishes an employer-employee relationship, excluding such payments from service tax liability under reverse charge. The Tribunal further noted that appointment and services of directors fall under the Negative List of services, reinforcing non-applicability of service tax. Precedents affirm that remuneration to whole-time directors functioning as employees does not attract service tax, thereby rendering the impugned order untenable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2025 08:15:07 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2025 08:15:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=840119" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Remuneration to Whole-Time Directors Treated as Salary, Not Service Taxable Under Section 65(105)(zzzz)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91111</link>
      <description>The CESTAT allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand and penalties for service tax levied on remuneration paid to whole-time directors. It was held that the directors, appointed under employment agreements and recognized as key managerial personnel under the Companies Act, function as employees rather than service providers. Their remuneration, subjected to TDS under the Income Tax Act, establishes an employer-employee relationship, excluding such payments from service tax liability under reverse charge. The Tribunal further noted that appointment and services of directors fall under the Negative List of services, reinforcing non-applicability of service tax. Precedents affirm that remuneration to whole-time directors functioning as employees does not attract service tax, thereby rendering the impugned order untenable.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2025 08:15:07 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91111</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>