https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775826 The SC dismissed the special leave petitions challenging the registration of the ECIR and issuance of summons under Section 50 of PMLA. The HC had held that the petitioner could not be prosecuted under the impugned ECIR for offences under the Money Laundering Act, but this finding was limited to the ECIR and did not affect separate criminal proceedings. The SC found no error in the HC's reasoning and upheld the decision, thereby denying permission for investigation based on the impugned ECIR. en-us Mon, 21 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Aug 2025 08:15:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775826 The SC dismissed the special leave petitions challenging the registration of the ECIR and issuance of summons under Section 50 of PMLA. The HC had held that the petitioner could not be prosecuted under the impugned ECIR for offences under the Money Laundering Act, but this finding was limited to the ECIR and did not affect separate criminal proceedings. The SC found no error in the HC's reasoning and upheld the decision, thereby denying permission for investigation based on the impugned ECIR. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 21 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775826