<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 22 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775835</link>
    <description>Duty drawback adjudication was set aside where the assessee had been given only one personal hearing and claimed that relevant Bank Realization Certificates and supporting documents were available. The Court held that fair opportunity and principles of natural justice required the matter to be reopened, so the adverse order was quashed and the case remanded to the same authority for fresh consideration after permitting production of the documents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2025 08:15:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=840093" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 22 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775835</link>
      <description>Duty drawback adjudication was set aside where the assessee had been given only one personal hearing and claimed that relevant Bank Realization Certificates and supporting documents were available. The Court held that fair opportunity and principles of natural justice required the matter to be reopened, so the adverse order was quashed and the case remanded to the same authority for fresh consideration after permitting production of the documents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775835</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>