<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 47 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775860</link>
    <description>ITAT Pune upheld the reopening of assessment under section 147 within four years, finding the AO&#039;s reasons for reopening valid regarding cash deposits during demonetization. The tribunal accepted the assessee&#039;s explanation that the disputed Rs. 8,00,000 cash deposit arose from genuine cash sales, supported by consistent business records. However, the addition of estimated profit on suppressed purchases was deleted, as the AO erred in calculating suppressed purchases and the related addition of Rs. 13,07,642. The tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on this issue and allowed the assessee&#039;s ground challenging the addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2025 08:15:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=840068" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 47 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775860</link>
      <description>ITAT Pune upheld the reopening of assessment under section 147 within four years, finding the AO&#039;s reasons for reopening valid regarding cash deposits during demonetization. The tribunal accepted the assessee&#039;s explanation that the disputed Rs. 8,00,000 cash deposit arose from genuine cash sales, supported by consistent business records. However, the addition of estimated profit on suppressed purchases was deleted, as the AO erred in calculating suppressed purchases and the related addition of Rs. 13,07,642. The tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on this issue and allowed the assessee&#039;s ground challenging the addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775860</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>