<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 55 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775868</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi held that delay in filing Form 67 for claiming Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) does not warrant denial of the credit. The tribunal observed that Rule 128(9) does not mandate disallowance of FTC due to late submission of Form 67, which is a directory, not mandatory, requirement. Further, the DTAA provisions override the Act, and the Rules cannot contradict the Act. Consequently, the AO was directed to allow the FTC claimed by the assessee. The appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2025 08:15:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=840060" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 55 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775868</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi held that delay in filing Form 67 for claiming Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) does not warrant denial of the credit. The tribunal observed that Rule 128(9) does not mandate disallowance of FTC due to late submission of Form 67, which is a directory, not mandatory, requirement. Further, the DTAA provisions override the Act, and the Rules cannot contradict the Act. Consequently, the AO was directed to allow the FTC claimed by the assessee. The appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775868</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>